Fairways Community Webspace
12 Ways to Spot Ineffective Leadership
Last updated 05/17/2014
Copyright 2014 Fairways Community
Fairways Community, its affiliates, and Night Owl Products and Services are not responsible for warranties or representations made by advertisers,
residents or members, through the site, included but not limited to economic loss, injury or other damages related to information received or transmitted on
By Mike Myatt, Chief Executive Officer, N2growth
If I only had a nickel for every time I’ve been asked, “is there a simple test that can quickly
determine an executive’s leadership ability?” The short answer is yes, but keep in mind,
simple and fast aren’t always the same thing as effective. There are a plethora of diagnostic
tests, profiles, evaluations, and assessments that offer insights into leadership ability, or a lack
thereof. My problem with these efforts is they are overly analytical, very theoretical, and
subject to bias. That said, they are fast, easy, and relatively inexpensive. The good news is,
there is a better way. If you really want to determine someone’s leadership ability, give them
some responsibility and see what they do with it. Leaders produce results. It’s not always
pretty, especially in the case of inexperienced leaders, but good leaders will find a way to get
the job done.
In a previous post entitled Looking For Leadership, I share a number of concerns about corporate America’s obsession over theoretical
academic tests. There is a subtle abdication of responsibility that has occurred as rationalizations take place around DISC scores, or
justifications surrounding a 360 review are used to defend an ineffective leader. My question is this: what about real world tests? If your
enterprise has trouble identifying leaders, or has a shortage of leaders, you don’t have a testing problem – you have a leadership problem.
One of the primary responsibilities of leadership is to create more and better leaders. I believe it was John Maxwell who said, “there is no
success without a successor.”
It’s important to realize that just because someone is in a leadership position, doesn’t necessarily mean they should be. Put another way, not
all leaders are created equal. The problem many organizations are suffering from is a recognition problem – they can’t seem to recognize good
leaders from bad ones. In the text that follows, I’ll address how to spot ineffective leaders pointing out a few things that should be obvious,
but apparently aren’t:
Poor Character: A leader who lacks character or integrity will not endure the test of time. It doesn’t matter how intelligent, affable,
persuasive, or savvy a person is, if they are prone to rationalizing unethical behavior based upon current or future needs they will eventually fall
prey to their own undoing.
Lack of Performance: Nobody is perfect, but leaders who consistently fail are not leaders, no matter how much you wish they were. While
past performance is not always a certain indicator of future events, a long-term track record of success should not be taken lightly. Someone
who has consistently experienced success in leadership roles has a much better chance of success than someone who has not. It’s important
to remember unproven leaders come with a high risk premium.
Poor Communication Skills: Show me a leader with poor communication skills and I’ll show you someone who will be short-lived in their
position. Great leaders can communicate effectively across mediums, constituencies, and environments. They are active listeners, fluid
thinkers, and know when to dial it up, down, or off.
Self-Serving Nature: If a leader doesn’t understand the concept of “service above self” they will not engender the trust, confidence, and
loyalty of those they lead. Any leader is only as good as his or her team’s desire to be led by them. An over abundance of ego, pride, and
arrogance are not positive leadership traits. Long story short; if a leader receives a vote of non-confidence from their subordinates - game
One Size Fits All Leadership Style: Great leaders are fluid and flexible in their approach. They understand the power of, and necessity for
contextual leadership. “My way or the highway” leadership styles don’t play well in today’s world, will result in a fractured culture, and
ultimately a non-productive organization. Only those leaders who can quickly recognize and adapt their methods to the situation at hand will
be successful over the long haul.
Lack of Focus and Follow-Through: Those leaders who lack the focus and attention to detail needed to apply leverage and resources in an
aggressive and committed fashion will perish. Leaders who do not possess a bias toward action, or who cannot deliver on their obligations
will not be successful. Leadership is about performance - Intentions must be aligned with results for leaders to be effective.
Not Forward Looking: No vision equals no leadership. Leaders satisfied with the status quo, or who tend to be more concerned about
survival than growth won’t do well over the long-run. The best leaders are focused on leading change and innovation to keep their
organizations fresh, dynamic and growing. Bottom line – leaders who build a static business doom themselves to failure.
Disconnected from the Market: Leaders not attuned to the needs of the market will fail. As the old saying goes, if you’re not taking care of
your customers, someone else will be more than happy to. Successful leaders focus on customer satisfaction and loyalty. They find
ways to consistently engage them and incorporate them into their innovation and planning initiatives. If you ignore, mistreat, or otherwise don’t
value your customer base, your days as a leader are most certainly numbered.
(note: Association memebrs are the customers of the Board)
Not Invested: Leaders are fully committed to investing in those they lead. They support their team, build into their team, mentor and coach
their team, and they truly care for their team. A leader not fully invested in their team won’t have a team – at least not an effective one.
Not Accountable: Real leaders are accountable. They don’t blame others, don’t claim credit for the success of their team, but always accept
responsibility for failures that occur on their watch. Most of all, leaders are accountable to their team. I’ve always said that leaders not
accountable to their people will eventually be held accountable by their people.
Not Focused: Leaders who are not intentional and are not focused, will fail themselves and their team. Leaders who lack discipline will
model the wrong behaviors and will inevitably spread themselves too thin. Organizations are at the greatest risk when leaders lose their focus.
Lacking Vision: Poor vision, tunnel vision, vision that is fickle, or a non-existent vision will cause leaders to fail. A leader’s job is to align the
organization around a clear and achievable vision. This cannot occur when the blind lead the blind.
The moral of this story is leaders need to be honest, have a demonstrated track record of success, be excellent communicators, place an
emphasis on serving those they lead, be fluid in approach, have laser focus, and a bias toward action. If these traits are not possessed by your
current leadership team, or your up and coming leaders, you will be in for a rocky road ahead.
Which of these traits stand out to you? Do you have any other signs of ineffective leaders worthy of mention? Leave a comment and share
your insights with others.
- See more at: http://www.n2growth.com/blog/6-traits-of-ineffective-leaders/#sthash.ttWMBycD.dpuf
This site has been donated to this group and is maintained by a
former Fairways II resident, Mike Bielkiewicz